About Me

My photo

Mr. Zuber Ahmed Khan is a Muslim by birth, has got strong and stiff views on Islam. Mr. Zuber believes in Humanity when Islam is in trouble. He believes any Muslim Men or Women should die for Islam when required. Mr. Zuber Ahmed Khan completed his Post Graduate in Public Administration in the year 1995 and stands in first class. He completed his Diploma in Computer Hardware and Software Engineering from Bombay. Completed Masters Degree in Journalism & Mass Communication and stand in first Class.

Tuesday, 19 October 2010

Adequate Security around the High Court of Bombay

Dear Sir,


1. Last couple of days security around Bombay High Court has been tightened by Government of Maharashtra. Even it is not possible for the litigants to entre in the High Court premises, without entry passes, security is OK but harassment in the name of security is resented. What is the theme behind entry pass? It is still ambiguous.

2. I am quite ambiguous, to whom security is provided, to Kasab or to the Advocates attending the matter of Kasab. Question of security to Kasab does not arise because he is lodged in Jail and attending the Court proceeding only on Video Conferencing, and there was enough security since last couple of years for the litigants as well as for the advocates attending to the High Court. Belongings of everybody scanned to get entry in the High Court. This extra burden of entry pass is out of understanding.

3. If the proceeding of Kasab goes for many days, litigants will have to suffer till then. If somebody have got matter by 11 o’clock that means he has to come for queue upto 9 O’clock to get the entry pass.

4. That is all politics to show international community and to the country that even we have provided adequate security to Kasab the sole survivor of 26/11.

5. Kindly remove the entry pass system while entering in the campus of Top Judicial Authority of Maharashtra, which caused a lot of inconvenience to the litigants. Security is OK.

Thanking you,


Zuber Ahmed Khan

Sunday, 10 October 2010

Modesty of Woman is in danger in Israel Prison

Ref: “Israeli Soldier Dances…….” News Article Times of India 6th Oct. 2010.


Dear Sir,

This is the reference to a news article published in The Times of India of 6th Oct. 2010. In which an Israeli soldier dances around the Palestinian woman in prison. She has been handcuffed. We are living in the 21st century in which women are the sculptures of the civilized society and not meant for the household or misused by the male members.

Israeli Army violates the resolution of UNO Charter 48/104, Article 1 which says “violence against women means any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private life.”

India recognized Israel the biggest terrorist Nation and usurper of Arab land Palestine. It is high time India should break diplomatic relations with Israel.

It is prayed:-

1. Derecognize Israel Internationally.

3. Impose economic / oil embargo on Terrorist Nation Israel.

2. Depute UN Peace Keeping Force in Israel to monitor Palestine situation.

3. Book Israel Prime Minister under War Crimes, Crimes Against Women.

Yours Sincerely,

Zuber Ahmed Khan

Even Supreme Court verdict is also not acceptable to us for Babri Masjid

Ref: 1. My article “Once again Indian Judicial System........ unbiased Judgement”

       2. “Accept Ayodhya Verdict” Hindustan Time of dated 09/10/10
       3. “My Aunt and the Verdict” article by Sujata Anandan H.T. 06/10/10
       4. “Faith cannot be the basis of any judgement” H.T. 05/10/10

Dear Sir,

Even the Supreme Court verdict will not be acceptable to us if it does not favour to the Muslims faith in Babri Masjid case at Ayodhya. The land belongs to the Masjid and there is no compromise on that issue.

Mr. Mahmood Madni’s appeal to the Muslims to accept the Allahabad High Court verdict in Hindustan Times dated 09/10/10 is absolutely foolish. The statement is not appreciated, who is Mr. Madani to speak on behalf of Muslim community or Masjid, which is the property of Allaha.

It is the duty of every Muslims all over the globe to safeguard the masjid upto the last drop of blood. When any Masjid comes down in any country then jihad (The Holy War for Islam) is become an obligation on every Muslim of the globe against that country.

Mr. Moulana misleads the Muslim community saying to accept the verdict rather he should have passed the fatwa for jihad.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Zuber Ahmed Khan

Saturday, 2 October 2010

Once again Indian Judicial System fails to deliver unbiased Judgement

Ref:  My article “Influence of Saffron Brigade on Indian Judiciary” of dated 24/09/10.

Dear Sir,


1. Long awaited judgement of 6 decades has come out on 30/09/2010, which also opens the influence of saffron elements on Indian Judiciary. Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court delivered the Judgement about 2.5 acares land of Babri Masjid at Ayodhya. It is not surprising that once again the judgement goes against the Muslims and appeasing the Hindus. Merely one third land has allotted to Muslims that means Muslims are on the Charity of Judiciary. Remaining judgement favours the Hindus including removing of Idol Ramalala, temple demolished by Babar and it is the birth place of Lord Rama & so on.

2. Ram is the mythical character has got no historic value. How it is possible the idols of Ram Lala has immerged without any external support. If the man made structures started emerging then Indian Government should stop her functioning and be remain on Ram Bharose.

3. Judiciary is not believing or working on the sentiments or religious belief. It is working on the facts and documentary evidences especially in the suit property or land disputes. There is no direct proof that a temple has been demolished by the Emperor Babar.

4. Judicial verdict of Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High court is communal biased and politically motivated deprives the Muslim community, the legal rights on suit property or land.

It is prayed:

1. Before appointing a judicial person his back ground and communal mentality should be scrutinised.

2. Reserve 20% Muslims in Judiciary, police services and Indian Army.

3. The Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court transgress its impartial attitude in suit property or land disputes and divided the land into three parts which perhaps had no rights to do so.

4. The Judiciary has always supported the aggressors in this dispute. Even Prime Minister Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru had ordered to remove the Ramlala idol from Babri Masjid central dome, yet the Union Home Minister Vallabh Bhai Patel, UP Chief Minister Govend Vallabh Panth and the Faizabad Court disobeyed the order. The culprits of 22/12/1949 who illegally interjected Ramlala idol under the central dome of Babri Masjid were not prosecuted in log 60 years.

5. Hon’ble Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court should have honoured the orders of Late P.M. P.V. Narsimha Rao issued on 7/12/1992 for the removal of make shift temple from Babri Masjid site, and ought to have considered this fact in his verdict.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Zuber Ahmed Khan

Switzerland Type of Government in Kashmir

Dear Sir,


It is the best time to think seriously for the uplift of Kashmir, neglecting and side by the interest of Indian, Pakistan government. Kashmir should include the part of POK, IOK and the area of Aksai Chin or Laddakh. An absolute autonomy should be given to Kashmir about internal affairs, judiciary, revenue and administration.

There should not be any military inside Kashmir. Indian military from Indian side Pakistan Military from Pakistan side and China should take care of any aggression only on the boarder. There should be nominal procedure to visit and get entry in Kashmir for the Indians, Pakistanis and Chinese.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,


Zuber Ahmed Khan